
Photo courtesy of Irene Scott for AusAid/Flikr
By Kholofelo Kugler
The European Union (EU)-Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs), which concluded in 2014, will have economic winners and losers, as does any trade agreement. While countries in West Africa could take full advantage of the EU-West Africa EPA to advance economic growth, this region, like each SSA EPA group, must also be aware of its sensitive economic sectors and mitigate losses effectively.
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has entered a new era in its relationship with the European Union (EU), one that envisages an economic partnership model underpinned by sustainable development, to replace the traditional aid donor-recipient engagement that ensued following Africa’s independence from EU member states. SSA forms part of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) group of countries with which the EU has managed trade relationships under various Conventions from Yaoundé to Cotonou. These arrangements have largely failed to achieve any meaningful economic gains for SSA.(2) Indeed, ACP countries have seen their share of the EU market diminish from 8% in 1975 to 3% in 2012.(3)