Analysis in brief: The discussion about the exploitation of Africa’s mineral resources, particularly rare earth minerals, is being conducted from a Western point of view. In this context, African countries have legitimate reasons for seeking the best deal for themselves for commodities whose deposits are vast but, nonetheless, finite.
The term ‘resource management’ carries the benign suggestion of simply managing natural resources for maximum benefit for the country on whose lands they originate. However, the term is often used interchangeably with the more sinister ‘resource nationalism’, with its implications of nationalising foreign investments and thus making investment riskier. To African nations, resource management is the preventative function against what was robbed of their immense but finite mineral wealth during the colonial era. To foreign investors, the term is synonymous with stifling state protectionism. Two often-competing factors are essential to the economic prosperity of African nations. The first is the need to keep African nations as senior partners in the exploitation of their minerals. The second is need to maintain foreign investment. The optimal way to achieve both goals is through negotiations with multinational firms who have business sense to honour national sovereignties.
Read more